利用者:RobinsonLeppert64

提供:ArtWiki
ナビゲーションに移動 検索に移動


While there are arguments on both sides from the debate, medicinal marijuana has several key advocates that give it a significant amount of credibility.

1. Consumer Reports - The business has stated that folks who are suffering from AIDS or some form of terminal cancer, the advantages supplied by the drug seem to be much more significant than the risks, either the ones that are substantiated or those that are even suspected. They also argued that, for the same reason the FDA is quick to approve new cancer medications, they should also be lenient with the use of medicinal marijuana for those who are crictally ill.

2. American College of Physicians - The ACP doesn't strongly argue in support of the benefits of medicinal marijuana, however they do argue that it should not be classified as a schedule I controlled substance. They reason that there are circumstances that can be effective, which it's relatively safe compared to other drugs with the same classification. They most strongly argue for legal protection for physicians recommending it or patients taking it on recommendation.

3. Jocelyn Elders, MD - Elders claims the herbal remedy is less toxic than most of the drugs prescribed by doctors every day. She also claims that there is "overwhelming" evidence showing that it is good at easing the symptoms of certain kinds of nausea, pain, and vomiting. It's especially good for people dealing with cancer, AIDS, and multiple sclerosis, or the medications they use to treat these diseases.

Legal Marijuana Smoking

4. Donald Abrams, MD - Within the Annals of Internal Medicine, Abrams stated that AIDS patients who had either smoked marijuana or used the medication inside a pill includes a more efficient immune system then people who had used an imitation version from the medication. Furthermore, they apparently had a better appetite, simply because they gained, on average, four more pounds than those who were using the false version.

5. Judge Francis L. Young - Young is a DEA Administrative Law Judge. He stated that the DEA shouldn't prevent people from taking advantage of the benefits of medicinal marijuana if they were in need of it. He stated that the 9-6-88 ruling clearly demonstrated several benefits of cannabis as a medical drug.

6. Gregory T. Carter, MD - Carter argues that Marinol isn't a substitute for marijuana, containing several ingredients apart from the THC that Marinol is supposed to simulate.

7. Lester Grinspoon, MD - On the risks of the drug's use, Grinspoon of the Harvard School of medicine stated the proof of marijuana's supposed health problems is lacking. While the drug has been "smoked widely" throughout Western civilization for more than four decades, he noted there hasn't been just one case linking using marijuana to lung cancer or emphysema.